Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35704 (RAJ)

DINESH KUMAR v. MATADEEN S/O SHYOSAHAY

CW/208/2025 · 2025-01-09

Avneesh Jhingan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1379] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 208/2025 1. Dinesh Kumar, S/o Sampatram 2. Girraj, S/o Ramjilal 3. Rampratap, S/o Ramnarayan 4. Panchuram, S/o Dhansiram 5. Pooranchand, S/o Sundaram 6. Bhikharam, S/o Ramnarayan 7. Rajendra Kumar Siani, S/o Ganeshilal 8. Vinodilal, S/o Sampatram 9. Amarsingh Saini, S/o Ramjilal Saini 10. Prakash S/o Dhansiram, All Through General Public Of Shivnagar, Residents Of Shivnagar, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Matadeen S/o Shyosahay, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 2. Umraw S/o Shyosahay, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 3. Kashiram S/o Chhitarmal, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 4. Jagram S/o Chhitarmal, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 5. Kailash S/o Kishori, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 6. Sugan S/o Gyarsi, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 7. Omkar S/o Gyarsi, Resident Of Dhani Isarwali, Tan- Chhipari, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. 8. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi [2025:RJ-JP:1379] (2 of 2) [CW-208/2025] For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 09/01/2025 Learned counsel for petitioners after arguing for some time realising that matter is pending before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bansur after remand by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 26.07.2024, is not pressing this petition with liberty to approach the SDO Court for impleadment/being an intervener and make a prayer for interim order. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/20