Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 357 (UTT)

AMARJEET SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/350/2025 · 2026-02-23

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA No. 350 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Kundan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant apprise to this Court that after filing of the charge sheet, proceedings have been challenged in C482 No. 196 of 2025, wherein the trial proceedings have been stayed. 4. Since, the proceedings of the trial court have been stayed in C482 No. 196 of 2025, filed by the applicant, therefore, there is no useful purpose to continue the instant anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 23.02.2026 Parul