Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35696 (JHR)

PRADEEP HADI ALIAS PRADEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6474/2025 · 2025-11-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:34195 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6474 of 2025 1. Pradeep Hadi @ Pradeep Kumar, aged about 18 years, son of Kartik Hadi 2. Bajrangi Hadi, aged about 39 years, son of late Shankar Hadi 3. Kartik Hadi, aged about 45 years, son of late Shankar Hadi 4. Dolu Hadi @ Dolu Kumar, aged about 23 years, son of Ram Khelawan Kol 5. Jitendra Dev @ Jitendra Kumar, aged about 25 years, son of Ram Khelawan Kol 6. Sanni Kol @ Shani Kol @ Shani Kumra, aged about 18 years, son of Ram Khelawan Kol 7. Ram Khelawan Kol, aged about 54 years, son of late Indal Kol All are residents of Rai Sahib File, Kurpania, P.O. Gandhinagar, P.S. Bermo (Gandhinagar O.P.), District-Bokaro, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo A.P.P. 04/ 17.11.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bermo P.S. (Gandhinagar O.P.) Case No. 96 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) & 3 (5) of the BNS, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Bermot at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both the F.I.Rs have been lodged on the same day. He further submits that altercation took place due to rash and negligent driving of the motorcycle. He then submits that now good sense has prevailed between the parties and matter has been compromised and a joint compromise petition has been filed before the learned Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 15 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of ( 2025:JHHC:34195 ) anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there 5. Considering that there is case and counter case between the parties and now matter has been compromised and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 15 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Bermo P.S. (Gandhinagar O.P.) Case No. 96 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.17.11.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-