BHAWANI SINGH S/O LATE SHRI BHANWAR SINGH v. THE BAID FINSERV LIMITED, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BAID LEASING AND FINANCE CO. LTD.)
CW/1514/2025 · 2025-07-03
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1514/2025 Bhawani Singh S/o Late Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Ac-4, Gayatri Sadan, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Baid Finserv Limited, (Formerly Known As Baid Leasing And Finance Co. Ltd.), Baid House, Iind Floor, 1- Tara Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302006
2. Shri Dinesh Sharma, Authorised Officer, The Baid Finserv Limited, (Formerly Known As Baid Leasing And Finance Co. Ltd.) Baid House, Iind Floor, 1- Tara Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302006
3. The Reserve Bank Of India, Ram Bag Circle, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/07/2025
1. Aggrieved by the notice dated 20.07.2024 issued by the respondent-finance company to Ratan kanwar, Devendra Singh and Renu Rathore under Section 13(2) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject land was partitioned by the petitioner and the petitioner is in possession of the respective portion which was partitioned and
(2 of 2) [CW-1514/2025] the same has no concern whatsoever with the borrowed amount taken by the aforesaid persons from the respondent- Bank, even then, the Bank is bent upon to take action against the property of the petitioner, therefore, interference of this Court is warranted.
3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the writ petition against such notice is not maintainable before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is at liberty to submit reply to the aforesaid notice to the respondent-Bank and in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would be at liberty to approach appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievance.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/3