[2025:RJ-JP:27149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 25506/2018 1. Laxmi Narayan Aloriya S/o Madan Lal Aloriya, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Ganwali, Post Lalwas, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Roshan Lal Verma S/o Babu Lal Verma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vpo Chawandia, Via Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, (Convener And Controller, Exam), Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Chief Personal Officer, Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. 3. The Secretary (Admn.), Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 21/07/2025 1. Instant writ petition was filed by petitioners on 15.11.2018, raising a grievance of non-granting appointment on the post of Technical Helper, pursuant to direct recruitment 2018-19, invited by the Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited. 2. As per case of petitioners, petitioner No.1 appeared in the written examination on 27.08.2018 and petitioner No.2 was appeared on 28.08.2018. In the result, petitioners were not shortlisted. 3. Petitioners have come up with a case that as per OMR sheets, petitioners secured higher marks than the last cut off [2025:RJ-JP:27149] (2 of 2) [CW-25506/2018] marks of the selected candidate in the list, but in support of such pleadings, neither name & marks of last selected candidate, have been detailed out nor they have been impleaded as party respondents in the writ petition nor petitioners have mentioned their marks. 4. On the previous date of hearing i.e. 08.07.2024, counsel for petitioner was directed to serve copy of writ petition in the Office of Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma, who has appeared on behalf of respondents and submits that copy has not been served in his Office, however, he submits that recruitment process on the post of Technical Helper for the year 2018-19 has already been completed long back and thereafter, fresh recruitment for the same post has also been initiated so also completed. 5. No interim order has been passed in favour of petitioners. 6. In such view of the matter, due to lack of pleadings and requisite documents, no case is make out in favour of petitioners, for consideration of their candidature on merits, moreso when they were not selected in the merit list. 7. As a result, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. 8. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/28