APHC010571402007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI A it $ o WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 141/2007 Appeal under section 19 of Family Courts Act, against the order and decree dated 7^'^ August, 2007 passed by the Judge Family Court at Visakhapatnam in O.P.No.277/2003 Between: ♦- y I.Vasupalli Yerramma, w/o. Kanakaraju, Aged 26 years. Female, Hindu D.NO.32-30-60, Kobbari Thota, Visakhapatnam ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT N0.1 AND I.Vasupalli Kanakaraju, S/o. Late Appanna, Aged 27 years, Male D.NO.32-3-61, Kobbari Thota, Visakhapatnam 2.Panta Anand, S/o. Guruvulu, Aged 27 years, Male, Kobbari Thota, Visakhapatnam D.No.32-3-66, ...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: 1.SRI. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SRI. A S C BOSE The Court made the following: APHC010571402007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO ThioUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO: 141 OF 2007 Between: Vasupalli Yerramma ...APPELLANT AND Vasupalli Kanakaraju Anr and Others Counsel for the Appellant: ...RESPONDENT'S) 1. N (P) AN JANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the.Respondent(S): 1.AS C BOSE The Court made the following JUDGMENT: The present appeal is preferred by the appellant-wife against the order and decree dated 07.08.2007 in OP No.277 of 2003 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam. The respondent-husband filed the said O.P. under Section 13 (1)(ia) of The Hindu Marriage Act-1955 seeking a decree to dissolve the marriage d^ted 12.11.1992 between the appellant and the respondent on the ground of adultery. The learned Family Judge after considering the oral and documentary evidence recorded a categorical finding with regard to the allegation of adultery and further that from 17.05.2003 onwards the appellant-wife and respondent-husband are living separately. The learned Family Judge accordingly allowed the O.P. and dissolved the marriage between the,parties. As the counsel for the appellant is no more notice was directed to the appellant to the address furnished in the cause title of the appeal, but the same was returned with an endorsement “No such addressee. Return to sender.” Be that as it may. It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondent that his counterpart appearing for the respondent-husband, in the OP, informed that .the respondent is no more. In the'aforementioned circumstances, this Court has no option, except to dismiss the matter. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. SDI- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court at Visakhapatnam (with records) 2. One CC to Sri N (P) Anjana Devi Satyanarayana, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri A S C Bose, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 5. Two CD Copies PR (gsg) A HIGH COURT DATED: 25/06/2025 JUDGMENT FCA 141/2007 DISMISSING THE APPEAL