1 2025:CGHC:8983 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5449 of 2024 1 - Shreyansh Pateriya S/o Lalit Prakash Pateriya Aged About 26 Years R/o- F-28, Ramashray, Vijayampuram Colony, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Post- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, North Block, Sector- 19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 WPS No. 5423 of 2024 1 - Sanjay Kumar Dhivar S/o Shankar Dhivar Aged About 27 Years R/o Jagannath Mandir Road, Baniyapara, Dev Shri Talkies Road, Motor Stand Ward, Dhamatari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Chief Minster Secretariat, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, North Block, Sector-19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :- Mr. Siddharth Tiwari, Advocate For State :- Mr. VivekSharma, Addl. A.G. For Respondent-PSC :- Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate in WPS No.5449/2024 & Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate in WPS No.5423/2024. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 20.02.2025 3 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the order has been passed by the State Government, as such, these writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. However, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the order which has been passed subsequently. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha