Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35671 (JHR)

RAJESH KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1353/2018 · 2025-11-17

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34259-DB -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1353 of 2018 1. Rajesh Kumar Singh aged 38 years, S/o Late Sripati Singh, Resident of Rangenibari, Jhagrahi, P.O. & P.S. - Rajganj, District - Dhanbad. 2. Anil Kumar Saw, aged about 43 years, S/o Late Radhika Prasad Saw, Resident of Baliapur Road, P.O. & P.S. Gobindpur, District - Dhanbad. 3. Upendra Kumar Yadav, aged 45 years, S/o Late C. Yadav, Resident of Bekarbandh, P.O., P.S. & District - Dhanbad. 4. Dip Kumar, aged about 45 years, S/o Kanahaiya Lal, Resident of Bekarbandh, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District -Dhanbad. 5. Jaidip Kumar, aged 48 years, S/o Sri Kanahaia lal, Resident of Bekarbadh, P.O., P.S. & District - Dhanbad. 6. Kashinath Prasad, aged 55 years, S/o Ram Ayodhya Singh, Resident of Bekarbadh, P.O., P.S. & District - Dhanbad. 7. Md. Akbar aged 48 years, S/o Md. Zainul, Resident of Katras, P.O. & P.S. - Katras, District - Dhanbad. ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Executive Engineer Minor irrigation Division, combined Building, P.O., P.S. & District - Dhanbad. 3. The Executive Engineer, Rural Development, Department (R.W.A.), Work Division combined Building P.O. & P.S. & District - Dhanbad. 4. The Executive Engineer Building Constant Department Building Division combined Building, P.O. & P.S. & District -Dhanbad. 5. The Secretary Zila Parisad, P.O. & P.S. & District - Dhanbad. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Gaurav Raj, A.C. to A.A.G-II For the Resp. No. 5: Mr. Navneet Toppo, Advocate. --------- 06/Dated: 17.11.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer. 2025:JHHC:34259-DB -2- Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty with the petitioners as aforesaid. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 17.11.2025 N.A.F.R. APK/VK.