SUNIYA KUMARI ALIAS SUNIA MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/1291/2025 · 2025-11-04
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35670 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35670 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation (2025:JHHC:33095-DB ) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1291 of 2025
Suniya Kumari @ Sunia Munda, D/o Gasu Munda, R/o Vill- Indipidi, P.O.- Arki, P.S.- Arki, Dist.- Khunti.
--- ---
Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand
--- --- Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA --- For the Appellant : Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Adv. For the State
: A.P.P.
---
I.A. No. 14281 of 2025.
04/04.11.2025 Heard Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P.
This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 42 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 42 days in filling the appeal is hereby condoned.
I.A. No. 14281 of 2025 stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1291 of 2025.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in M.C.R.A. No. 855/2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 28/2025 arising out of Kharsawan P.S. Case No. 35/2016, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
It has been alleged that the extremists had burnt some vehicles of the informant which were standing besides the road.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused Krish
Neutral Citation (2025:JHHC:33095-DB ) 2
Munda. It has further been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 21.11.2016.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.
Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant and the period of custody undergone by her, we while setting aside the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in M.C.R.A. No. 855/2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 28/2025 arising out of Kharsawan P.S. Case No. 35/2016 direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No. 35/2016.
This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated- 04th November, 2025. Preet/-