Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35668 (PNJ)

JATINDER KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/7750/2025 · 2025-03-20

Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jatinder Kumar State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Sahil Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. LAPITA BANERJI Under challenge in this writ petition is an 27, 2025 passed by the District Controller Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, District Faridkot (Annexure P the respondent No.4 cancelled the license of the petitioner who is the depot holder of a fair p 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the said cancellation was done arbitrarily and illegally. 3. Issue notice to the respondents. 4. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He s appeal available to the petitioner. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition being CWP-7750-2025 with efficacious statutory remedy. 6. Disposed of 7. Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed of. March 20, 202 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision : Jatinder Kumar Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sahil Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) Under challenge in this writ petition is an 27, 2025 passed by the District Controller Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, District Faridkot (Annexure P the respondent No.4 cancelled the license of the petitioner who is the depot holder of a fair price shop. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the said cancellation was done arbitrarily and illegally. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He submits that there is an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition being 2025 with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the alternative, efficacious statutory remedy. Disposed of accordingly. Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7750-2025 Date of Decision : 20.03.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Under challenge in this writ petition is an order dated February 27, 2025 passed by the District Controller Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, District Faridkot (Annexure P-9). Vide impugned order, the respondent No.4 cancelled the license of the petitioner who is the depot Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the said cancellation was done arbitrarily and illegally. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the ubmits that there is an alternative efficacious remedy of In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition being liberty to the petitioner to avail of the alternative, Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.03.21 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document