KESHARDEV NAGARMAL FIRM v. AJAY KUMAR JAIN SON OF LATE SHRI DHARAMCHAND JAIN
CRES/1/2025 · 2025-04-01
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35667 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35667 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14647] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 1/2025 in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 407/2024
1. Keshardev Nagarmal Firm, Resident Of Village Dujod Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) Through Owner, Partner (Sublimating)
2. Keshardev Son Of Shri Jamanlal Mahajan, Resident Of Dujod Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) (Sublimating)
3. Dilip Kumar Son Of Nagarmal Mahajan, Resident Of Bhairuji Ki Gali, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus Ajay Kumar Jain Son Of Late Shri Dharamchand Jain, Resident Of Deewan Ji Ki Haveli, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Bhinda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 01/04/2025
1.
Learned counsel for non-applicant respondent(s) submits that the impugned judgment and decree has already been executed and nothing survives for adjudication in SB Civil Second Appeal No. 407/2024.
2.
Learned counsel for applicant candidly admits that in pursuant to execution the possession of suit property has been taken over by respondent plaintiff.
3. Having considered the submissions, the restoration application rendered infructuous.
[2025:RJ-JP:14647] (2 of 2) [CRES-1/2025]
4. Hence, the restoration application is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
5. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /55