Chinta Verraju v. Bhupathiraju Venkata Suryanarayanaraju
AS/719/2009 · 2025-03-21
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35667 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35667 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010573162009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 719/2009 Between:
1. CHINTA VERRAJU, S/O. TATAYYA FISHING GADIMOGA, TALLAREVU MANDAL E.G.DISTRICT
2. SMT. CHINTA SITAMMA, W/O. VEERAJU FISHING GADIMOGA, TALLAREVU MANDAL E.G.DISTRICT
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. BHUPATHIRAJU VENKATA SURYANARAYANARAJU, S/o.SURYANARAYANARAJU CULTIVATION NAMAVANIPALEM, KAJULURU MANDAL.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. V V RAVI PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M R S SRINIVAS
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.719 OF 2009 J U D G M E N T:
Sri V.V.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants and Ms. P.Usha, learned counsel representing Sri M.R.S.Srinivas,
learned counsel for the respondent would submit that they jointly filed a Memo dated 08.05.2024, wherein the parties have amicably settled the issue involved in the Appeal out of the Court, at the intervention of elders.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, appellants & respondent appeared before this Court and produced their respective Aadhar Cards in proof of their identity and requested to record the compromise in the Appeal.
3.
Learned counsel identified their respective parties.
4. In that view of the matter, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn, on account of settlement out of the Court. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 21.03.2025 Pmk
7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT No.719 OF 2009
Date:21.03.2025 Pmk