Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35666 (JHR)

BIPIN KUMAR JHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THR. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETAY, DEPT. OF HOME, PRISON AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

WPC/5996/2025 · 2025-11-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34226 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5996 of 2025 ------ Bipin Kumar Jha, aged about 61 years, son of Late Sitaram Jha, Resident of Qr. No.6, Near Thana, Fouji Colony, PO-Sudamdih, PS- Sudamdih, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. Inspector General of Prisons, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Jail Inspectorate, TA Division Building Near Dhurwa Golchakkar, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh, having its office at PO & PS-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate Mr. Akashdeep, Advocate Ms. Alisha Lakra, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : M/s Mrinal Kanti Roy, GA-I M/s Rishi Ranjan Vats, AC to GA-I ------ 04/ 17th November,2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The only prayer made in this writ petition is for a direction upon the Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh (Respondent No.4) to dispose the representation dated 06.11.2024 (Anenxure-3), filed by the petitioner, considering the Government Resolution No.217 dated 18.01.2017. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order on the representation. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State 2025:JHHC:34226 2 submits that if the petitioner files a fresh representation annexing the resolution and all other documents which is in favour of the petitioner, the same will be considered and an appropriate order will be passed. 5. Without entering into the merit of this case, considering the said submission, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh- Respondent No.4 within a period of three weeks. On receipt of the said representation, the case of the petitioner will be considered by him within a period of six weeks. 6. The respondents are expected to pass an order, considering the resolution and the applicability of the same so far as the facts of this case is concerned. If the respondent No.4 finds that the petitioner is entitled for any benefit, the same should also be extended to the petitioner. 7. If the claim of the petitioner is rejected for any reason, the reasoned order should be communicated to the petitioner. 8. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 17th November, 2025 Sandeep, cp2