Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35665 (ALL)

PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ KUMAR BANSHKAR v. State of UP AND ANOTHER

A482/8297/2024 · 2025-09-24

Vikas Budhwar

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8297 of 2024 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Harish Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.K. Singh, learned AGA for the State as well as Shri Ashok Kumar Yadav, counsel for the opposite party no. 2. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.PC. has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 6094 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, of Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Jhansi, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)/ Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C. (C.A.W.), Jhansi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of the said proceedings, the parties have themselves compromised and thus a joint affidavit has been filed dated 13.02.2025. He submits that the compromise application shall be filed before the court below and interregnum period, subject to verification, in the meantime, till the verification is done, protection be accorded. 4. Learned AGA on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the same. 5. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the application stands disposed of directing the applicant to approach the court below while filing the original copy of compromise application and a self-attested copy of the present application and certified copy of the order passed today by 29.10.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Chandra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashok Kumar Yadav, G.A. Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Banshkar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. On the receipt of the same, the court below shall verify the compromise so filed by the parties and shall conclude the process for verification with most expedition. 7. Till the disposal of the compromise application, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in pursuance of Complaint Case No. 6094 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, of Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Jhansi, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)/ Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C. (C.A.W.), Jhansi. 8. In the event of default of any of the conditions by the applicant as referred to above, the interim protection shall stand vacated without reference to the Bench. 9. It is always open for the applicant to take legal recourse, subject to the fate of the outcome of the compromise application. September 25, 2025 A. Prajapati A482 No. 8297 of 2024 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad