Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3566 (JHR)

SATYENDRA SINGH v. MADHAV PRASAD BHATIA

C.M.P./242/2025 · 2025-03-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 242 of 2025 Satyendra Singh, son of late Shyam Bahadur Singh, aged about 60 years, resident of M.E. School Road, Jugsalai, P.O. and P.S. Jugsalai, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum ………………….Petitioner … Versus…. 1. Madhav Prasad Bhatia, son of late Hari Prasad Bhatia 2. Sanjay Kumar Bhatia, son of late Hari Prasad Bhatia Singh Both residents of Chowk Bazar, Jugsalai, P.O. and P.S. Jugsalai Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum .…… Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Sahay, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : ………. 03/Dated: 11/03/2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India for direction to dispose of the Eviction Case being Eviction Suit No. 31 of 2012 pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division-1 at Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proper direction may kindly be issued for disposal of the said eviction suit which is pending since long. 4. The Court has gone through the materials on record wherefrom it appears that what is the fault of the learned court in not disposing of the said suit, is not disclosed. It is for the parties to take diligent step for early disposal of the said suit. 5. In para 47.3 of the decision of the Constitution Bench in the case of “Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others” reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267 it has been held that Constitutional Courts in 2 the ordinary course should refrain from fixing a time bound schedule for the disposal of the cases pending before any other courts. It is for the concerned courts to prioritize the cases for early disposal. 6. In view of above no positive order can be passed. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the said suit diligently for early disposal. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/-