Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35657 (RAJ)

OMVEER YADAV SON OF SHRI NARENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/8752/2024 · 2025-01-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3654] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8752/2024 1. Omveer Yadav Son Of Shri Narendra Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bijorawas, P.s.behror Sadar, Distt. Kotputli, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Ayush Yadav Son Of Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Shimla, P.s. Mehada, Distt. Neem Ka Thana (Raj). 3. Shankar Yadav Son Of Shri Manohar Lal Yadav, R/o Patan , Sikar Neem Ka Thana, Raj. Presently Residing At Krishana Hostel, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through PP 2. Deepak Khinchi S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Khinchi, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mohabbatpura, P.s. Renwal, Distt. Jaipur Presently Residing At Hall Khatik Hostel Jhalana, Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2025 1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners u/S 528 BNSS with a prayer to quash and set aside the FIR No. 493/2023, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for offences u/S 147, 341, 323, 307, 379 & 336 IPC and u/S 3(1)(r) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the consequential proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners as well as the complainant are the students and at a spur of moment the alleged incident had taken place, whereas [2025:RJ-JP:3654] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8752/2024] there was no previous enmity between both the parties. He further submits that the parties have entered into compromise and the complainant also does not want to proceed further in the matter. 3. The complainant alongwith his counsel is present in the Court and does not dispute the fact of compromise between the parties. He also submits that he has no objections if the proceedings of the FIR are quashed. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the other material made available on record including the compromise deed. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners and more particularly the fact that the accused petitioners as well as the complainant are students and they have entered into a compromise and the complainant does not want to prosecute the accused petitioners, this Court feels that this is a fit case to exercise the inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings. 6. Accordingly this criminal misc. petition is allowed. The proceedings of FIR No. 493/2023, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for offences u/S 147, 341, 323, 307, 379 & 336 IPC and u/S 3(1)(r) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is quashed and set aside. 7. Stay application stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /142