Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:43427
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 848 of 2017 Mohammad Tariq Raza Quadri S/o Shri Ghous Mohammad Quadri Aged About 26 Years Wrongly Mentioned The Father Name of The Applicant As Shri Moulana Ghous In The Impugned Order R/o Ama Talab Road, Post Office Ward, Post Office and Police Station Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.,
... Applicant versus Smt. Nafees Fatima W/o Mohammad Tariq Raza Quadri, Aged About 20 Years R/o Imam Jama Masjid, Halwai Line, Post Office Raipur, Police Station City Kotwali, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.,
... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Rahim Ubwani, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board
26.08.2025
1. Heard Mr. Shivendu Pandya, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Rahim Ubwani, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The present revision has been filed with a following prayers:-
“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.08.29 10:34:55 +0530
2 prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allowed this criminal revision and the impugned order dated 30.11.2012 passed by the 1st Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) in M.J.C. No. 188/2012 (Smt. Nafees Fatima Vs. Mohammad Tariq Raza Quadri) may kindly be quashed and further may kindly be pleased to discharge the applicant from maintenance amount which is awarded against him in the interest of justice. This Hon'ble court be further pleased to pass any other order or relief in favour of the present applicant as it deems fit and proper under the
facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of Justice.”
3.
Learned counsel for the revisionist/applicant submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Let a certified copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Preeti