Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35654 (AP)

J. Ravi Kumar v. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meena, I.A.S.,

CC/4729/2024 · 2025-09-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010570752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4729/2024 Between: 1. J. RAVI KUMAR, S/O J. CHITTI BABU, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. ENFORCEMENT SUPERINTENDENT (SEB), (RETIRED) KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA, R/O FLAT NO. 301, VASAVI ENCLAVE, 4TH LANE, VIDYA NAGAR, CHINNA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530003 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (EXCISE) DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI NISHANT KUMAR I A S, COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon the respondents and punish them for committing contempt of orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P.No.16682 of 2021 dated 24-02-2023 passed by this Honble Court under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 24.02.2023 in W.P.No.16682 of 2021. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms. K. Anuradha, learned counsel representing Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 24.02.2023 in W.P.No.16682 of 2021 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 11.09.2025 TVN 190 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.4729 OF 2024 Date: 11.09.2025 TVN