[2025:RJ-JP:303] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.16444/2024 Aditya @ Bhupendra @ Guddu S/o Gyan Singh, R/o Village Bharangpur, Police Station Chiksana, District Bhartpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Yogesh Singhal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/01/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.306/2021, registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Bharatpur) District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, the accused-petitioner has preferred this second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the first anticipatory bail application was dismissed by this Court observing that there is no reasonable apprehension of arrest of the accused-petitioner. It is also contended that the learned trial Court has taken cognizance against the accused- petitioner for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and issued the summons and thereafter the arrest warrant. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:303] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16444/2024] and the complainant have arrived at compromise and the accused- petitioner has paid the entire amount to the complainant and the complainant has executed the affidavit regarding entering into compromise and receiving the entire amount, therefore, the second anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant concedes that the compromise have been arrived between the parties and complainant-Rajveer Singh has received amount of Rs.10,00,000/- from the accused-petitioner, therefore, if the second anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner is granted, then the complainant has no objection in this regard. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the second anticipatory bail application. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. Taken into note that the accused-petitioner and the complainant have arrived at compromise, without commenting further on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the second anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed. It is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Aditya @ Bhupendra @ Guddu S/o Gyan Singh, in connection with FIR No.306/2021, registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Bharatpur) District Bharatpur, he shall be enlarged on bail he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to [2025:RJ-JP:303] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16444/2024] the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-18