1 2025:CGHC:36781 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7441 of 2019 1 - Domar Singh Verma S/o Shri Shriram Verma Aged About 60 Years Society Manager ( Suspended ) Krishak Sewa Sahakari Samity Maryadit, Ghumka, Registration No. 1145, District - Rajnandgaon, R/o Village - Ghumka, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Registrar Cooperative Societies Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Society, Rajnandgaon District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Registrar, Cooperative Society, Durg Division District - Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Managing Director, Krishak Sewa Sahakari Samity Maryadit, Ghumka, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Anmol Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.07.30 13:16:36 +0530 2 Order on Board 29/07/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that impugned order (Annexure P/1) was challenged by the respondent No.4 before the Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Tribunal, Bilaspur, which has been quashed by the said Tribunal, therefore, petitioner wants to challenge the order dated 17.09.2021 passed by the Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Tribunal, Bilaspur i.e. Annexure R/1. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition in the light of changed circumstances. 2. The prayed made by the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4. 3. On due consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant petition with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi