^ APHC010570712018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 1856 OF 2018 Appeal filed under Section 96 R/w Order 41 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC against the Decree and Judgment in O S.No.12 of 2007 Dt 29-01-2018 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle. Between: The Church of South India Arogyavaram Medical Centre, Rep. by its Director, Dr.B.Wesley, Arogyavaram, Madanapalle Rural Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Appellant/Defendants No.1 AND M/s. Annapurna Constructions Company, Rep. by its Partner M.Syamala Rao in turn representing Partner No.2 to 4. Registered Office Housing Board Colony, Kadapa. M. Vijaya Bhaskar, Chittoor District. M. Hymavathi, Chittoor District. M. Manjula, Chittoor District. The Church of South India Rayalaseema Diocese CSI RD, Rep. by its Bishop, CSI RD Compound, Railway Station Road, Opp to Haripriya Lodge, Kadapa. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. r 6. The Church of South India (CSI), Cynadu, Rep. by its Moderator, CSl compound, Chennai. ...Respondents/Defendants No.2 and 3 (Respondents No.5 and 6 are not necessary parties in the appeal) Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGARAJU NAGURU for the Respondents: SRI RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM Counsel The Court made the following JUDGMENT: APHC010570712018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 1856/2018 / / Between: The Church Of South India Arogyavaram Medical Centre AND M/s Annapurna Constructions Company and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1.NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM JUDGMENT: (perHon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) On 19.06.2025, the following order was passed:- No representation for the appellant. 2. On 25.3.2025 and 22.4.2025, both the matters were adjourned at the request of appellant’s counsel. 3. As last opportunity, post the matters 17.07.2025. No further adjournment will be granted.” on 2. Ms. Linga Bhargava Lakshmi, learned counsel is present for the respondents. T 2 3. The appeal is dismissed for default. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle. 2. One CC to SRI. NAGARAJU NAGURU Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Chp NM r high court DATED; 17/07/2025 JUDGMENT AS NO. 1856 OF 2018 5( 2 5JUL 2025 )g! ^NasiMtSwUoii^ dismissing the appeal suit for default