2025:HHC:36453 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. LPA No. 756 of 2025 Decided on: 29th October, 2025 Achhar Singh .......Appellant Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant: Dr.Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Balram Sharma, Dy.SGI with Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) A perusal of the order under challenge dated 30.07.2025 would go on to show that it is a consent order interse the parties. Thus, we are of the considered view that if there is any ambiguity, which is to be cleared, it should be done by the Court, which has passed the impugned order and this Court is not in a position to have any knowledge as to what transpired when the order was passed. 2. Resultantly, counsel for the appellant does not press the present appeal and the same is disposed of as such, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2025:HHC:36453 with liberty to file review petition before the learned Single Judge. 3. Needless to say that since the appellant has preferred the present appeal, the review petition if filed within a period of four weeks from today, would be considered on merits, rather on the issue of limitation. ( G.S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) October 29, 2025 Judge (naveen)