Pydi Srinivasa Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/27080/2018 · 2025-04-10
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35648 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35648 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010570412018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27080/2018 Between: Pydi Srinivasa Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“…..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent though he was regularized his service after following due procedure, by issuing letter No. FSCS/2018-19/9, Dated- 09-07-2018, the petitioner’s service was terminated without any complaint which disciplinary proceedings is nothing but abuse of process of law and now at the petitioner become age barred who is depending of employment only his not having any other sources of income therefore the impugned proceedings issued the 2nd respondent is shall not be stand liable to set aside consequently held the petitioner shall continue into service and pass such other order or orders……”
2
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation would submit that in pursuance of the interim order passed by this Court, dated 03.08.2018, the petitioner is continuing in service, as such, no further orders are required in this matter.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Considering the submissions made, since the petitioner is continuing in the 4th respondent-Society, in the light of the interim order, the Writ Petition is
disposed of making the interim order as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 10.04.2025 ARR
3
33 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27080/2018
Dt.10.04.2025
ARR