IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2197 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Som Nath …….Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Dhanvanti & Ms. Anuja Mehta, proxy counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 07.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Director, HRTC, Shimla, learned proxy counsel for the respondents states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with. 2. Having carefully perused afore communication, which is taken on record vis-a-vis judgment, sought to be executed, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned proxy counsel representing the respondents. In terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, enhanced DA and IR from due date has been decided to be paid to the petitioner and in that regard, direction already stands issued to the concerned branch to release the arrears part of the due 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 and admissible DR/IR, as per instructions dated 07.01.2012 and 31.07.2024. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that arrears are released expeditiously, preferably within four weeks from today, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 10, 2025 (sunil)