SUNIL RAHUL GHORPADE v. DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MARATHWADA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR
WP/6045/2025 · 2026-08-19
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3564 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3564 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} wp6045-25.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6045 OF 2025 Sunil Rahul Ghorpade
PETITIONER VERSUS Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Through its Registrar RESPONDENT ....... Ms. Neha B. Kamble, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. S. Tope, Advocate for the Respondent .......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 19
th AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
1. By this Petition, the Petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :
“B. By issuing writ of mandamus the respondent be directed to consider the petitioner in the list of selected candidates for the 12 vacant seats. C. By issuing writ of mandamus the respondent be directed to consider the vacancy to be 27 seats as per the Research Guide List and consider the petitioner in the list of selected candidates.”
2. In the common affidavit in reply filed by the Respondent University, in the bunch of Petitions, following statement is 2026:BHC-AUG:37816-DB
{2} wp6045-25.doc made:
“The Faculty of Management Science has total 11 guides and most of the guides are already occupied by the candidates. However, considering the fraction of 0.5 in the subject of Management Science i.e. in W. P. No. 6045/2025 the respondent University willing and ready to accommodate the said petitioner namely Sunil Rahul Ghorpade for Ph.D. admission for the programme of 2024”
3. In view of the said statement, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petition may be disposed of, as the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed by the University.
4. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp6045-25.doc