APHC010570312013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13716/2013 Between: 1. V. ARUN KUMAR, S/O. V. VENKATACHARY,, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: WORKING AS LAISON OFFICER OF THE COMPANY OF M/S. VAKKAL IMPEX PRIVATE LTD., ALUMINIUM DIVISION, DEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, THUMKUNTA CHECKPOST, HINDUPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR APCPDCL, MINT COMPOUND, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SECRETARY, ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SINGARENI BHAVAN, REDHILLS, HYDERABAD. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, OPERATION CIRCLE, ANANTAPUR. 4. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, APCPDCL, OPERATION CIRCLE, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the petitioner's representation Dt.16.02.2013 in pursuant to - Memo No. CMD (CPDCL)/SE(Spi)/DE(LMRC)/F.No. /D.No.370/12, Dt.05.11.2012 for providing 30% of CMD (power supply) in peak hours i.e., 18.00 Hrs. to 22.00 Hrs. to the Vakkal Impex Private Ltd., Aluminium Division, Devarapalli Village, Thumkunta Checkpost, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation Dt.16.02.2013 for providing 30% of CMD (power supply) in peak hours i.e., 18.00 Hrs. to 22.00 Hrs. to the Vakkal Impex Private Ltd., Aluminium Division, Devarapalli Village, Thumkunta Checkpost, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District and to pass such other order or orders as this Honible Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16796 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation Dt.16.02.2013 in pursuant to Memo No. CMD (CPDCL)/SE(Spl)/DE(LMRC)/ F.No. /D.No.370/12, Dt.05.11.2012 in accordance with law, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hong)le Court may deems fit just and proper in the Circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 27174 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title of the petitioner as "M/s Vakkal Impex Private Ltd., Aluminium Division, Devarapalli Village, Thumkunta Checkpost, Hinduput Mandal, Anantapur District, Rep by its Laison Officer V.Arun Kumar, S/o V.Venkatachary, Aged 50 years, R/o Thumkunta Check Post, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District" instead of "V.Arun Kumar, S/o V.Venkatachary, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Working as Laison Officer of the Companyn ofn M/s Vakkal Impex Private Ltd., Aluminium Division, Devarapalli Village, Thumkunta Checkpost, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District" IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 145872 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 3. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 24.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13716 of 2013 Date: 26.06.2025 IKN