1 2025:CGHC:36371 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 749 of 2025 1 - Gaukaran S/o Late Puran Lal Verma Aged About 45 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Jiya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - Janak Bai W/o Late Puran Lal Verma Aged About 63 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Jiya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 2 - Jaikaran S/o Late Puran Lal Verma, Aged About 29 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Jiya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 3 - Shyamkaran S/o Late Puran Lal Verma Aged About 38 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Jiya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 4 - Pyari Bai W/o Late Puran Lal Verma Aged About 61 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Jiya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Bemetara C.G. 6 - Ahilya Bai W/o Kunwar Singh Verma Aged About 66 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Batera (Kusmi) Tehsil Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 7 - Lobhan Verma, S/o Judavan Verma (Died) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.07.28 18:07:37 +0530 2 7.1 - Raj Kumar Verma S/o Lobhan Verma Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Choranga Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh. 7.2 - Rajkumari Verma D/o Lobhan Verma Aged About 20 Years Village Choranga Tehsil Simga District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh. 8 - Arjun S/o Judavan Verma Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Choranga Tehsil Simga District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh 9 - Basanta Bai W/o Late Prem Verma Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Amora, Tehsil Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 10 - Kuntibai W/o Punnu Verma, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Karchuva, Tehsil Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Kshamanidhi Baghel, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For State/Respondent No.5 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 28/07/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of SA No.280/2020, which was dismissed vide order dated 09.07.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that on 09.07.2025, counsel appearing for the applicant was engaged in another Court, thus, he could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want 3 of prosecution. Hence, the said mistake was bonafide and the applicant wants to contest the case on merits, thus the instant MCC may be allowed. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, instant MCC is hereby allowed. 4. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore SA No.280/2020, (Gaukaran vs. Janak Bai and Others) in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi