Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35634 (AP)

SHAIK AMEER v. DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO, IPS

CC/4689/2024 · 2025-07-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010572212024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4689/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK AMEER, S/O. KASIM, E.NO.725350, OCC MECHANIC IN APSRTC, MACHERLA DEPOT AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O. D.NO 11-1-52, MACHERLA,PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO IPS, VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, APSRTC, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA KRISNNA DISTRICT. 2. G VIJAYA GEETHA, REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, GUNTUR REGION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. K SRINIVASA RAO, THE DEPUTY CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER APSRTC NARASARAOPET. PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. BATHULA VEERA SWAMI, DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, MACHARLA DEPOT, PALNADU, DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PITCHAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SANISETTY VENKATESWARLU SC For APSRTC 2 The Court made the following: ORDER : This contempt case has been filed due to the non-compliance of the orders dated 08.02.2024 of this Court in W.P.No.10363 of 2019 by the petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that they have complied the order passed by this Court and they have not committed any contempt and this contempt case may be closed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the case may be closed, since they have complied the order giving liberty to the petitioner to raise his objections in case of any difference in calculating the arrears amount. 5. Recording the same, since the respondent-authorities have complied the order passed by this Court, this contempt case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise his objections, if any, regarding the difference in calculating the arrears amount. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 11-07-2025 MH 3 15 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA C.C.No.4689 of 2024 Dt.11.07.2025 MH