Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11665 WP No. 31386 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31386 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MANJULA N.
D/O SRI NARYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.111, PANCHAJANY OPPOSITE SBI COLONY COMMUNITY HALL KAREKALLU KAMAKSHI PALYA, BENGALURU - 560 079 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJA H C., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BBMP OFFICE HUDSON CIRCLE, CORPORATION BENGALURU - 560 001
2.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BBMP OFFICE, BEGUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 068 Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11665 WP No. 31386 of 2024
3.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP OFFICE, ARKERE MICO LAYOUT, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076
4.
SMT MAMATHA W/O SRI MOHAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.37, 3RD CROSS, 3RD MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT VASANTHAPURA MAIN ROAD, UTTARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 061 … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAMIDHA PRADEEP WAINGANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI T. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23/10/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-C WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME FOR THE OUTER LIMIT OF 2 WEEKS, CONSEQUENTLY THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED DIRECT ALL THE RESPONDENTS TO PRODUCE THE APPROVED PLAN AND LICENSE IN THE EVENT OF THEY ISSUED WITH RESPECT TO THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11665 WP No. 31386 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has filed a memo which reads as hereunder:
"The above named petitioner bring it to the notice of this Hon'ble court, that Corporation authorities have already initiated proceedings under Section 248 (1) and (2) of BBMP Act, 2020 on 03.03.2025, as such this writ petition does not survive for further consideration in the interest of justice and equity."
2. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as not calling for any further adjudication in light of respondent authorities having initiated the proceedings. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Np/-