Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35625 (HP)

JOGI RAM BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./2179/2025 · 2025-12-12

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2179 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Jogi Ram Bhardwaj …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 10.12.2025, issued under the signatures of ADG-cum-Director Fire Services, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Courts finds that respondents, after having received legal opinion from learned Advocate General, have decided to implement the judgment subject to outcome of LPA. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that consequential benefits 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 flowing from the aforesaid judgment, if not already released, shall be released within four weeks. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, is complied with within four weeks from today, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 12, 2025 (sunil)