Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35624 (AP)

BANDI MAGAMMA, KRISHNA DT & 2 OTRS., v. THE STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR.,

CRLRC/543/2017 · 2025-09-18

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010569332017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 543/2017 Between: 1. BANDI MAGAMMA, KRISHNA DT, W/O. KOTEWARA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-12, IBRAHIMPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. BANDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO, S/O. KOTEWARA RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, R/O. D.NO.3-12, IBRAHIMPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. BANDI PULLAMA @ ANUSHA,, W/O. MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED 33 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-12, IBRAHIMPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, (ANDHRA PRADESH) HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. BANDI KIRAN KRANTHI, W/O. LATE BUTCHI BABU, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC: LDC, R/O. D.NO.31-15-14, KATURUVARI STREET, MACHAVARAM DOWN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case to the Hon'ble Court against the Judgment made in Crl.A.No. 78 of 2013 on the file in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court Vijayawada, dated 14-02-2017 for the following amongst other: IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 887 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings dated 14-02-2017 passed in Crl.A.No.78 of 2013 on the file in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court Vijayawada and pass such other order or orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 3 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 12805 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.543 of 2017 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the orders dated 14.02.2017 passed in Crl.A.No.78 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, which is filed against the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.1569 of 2013 in D.V.C.No.86 of 2013. 2. As seen from the eCourt case status, the D.V.C.No.86 of 2013 was disposed of 29.11.2018. 3. Since the main case itself is disposed of, this Court views that no further orders are required in this revision. 4. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed as cause does not survive due to disposal of D.V.C.No.86 of 2013. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 19.09.2025 M K K