VIKAS SAHANI @ RAJA @ TAKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/2562/2025 · 2025-04-14
Vivek Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35617 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35617 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:54816 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2562 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikas Sahani @ Raja @ Takla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Shukla,Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 58 of 2024, under Sections 457, 380 IPC, Police Station Muhammadabad, District- Ghazipur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the investigation is pending in the matter. A prima facie case is made out. Referring to the provisions of Section 41 and 41-A Cr.P.C. it is submitted that since offences levelled in the first information report are punishable up to seven years only, the applicant cannot be arrested. An apprehension of arrest shown in the anticipatory bail is not genuine. Thus prayer has been made for rejection of anticipatory bail. 5. I have considered the rival submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties. 6. In the matter, it is evident from the record that anticipatory bail has been moved for the offences in which the maximum punishment is seven years. There is a specific provision under Section 41 and 41-A Cr.P.C. on point of arrest of the accused relating to the offences punishable up to seven years. Until and unless the mandate given in Section 41 and 41-A Cr.P.C. is complied by the Investigating Officer, accused of such offences cannot be arrested. 7. Thus keeping in view the statutory provisions on point of arrest of the accused, the Court is of the opinion that there is no need of anticipatory bail as the applicant cannot be arrested without complying with the provision given in Section 41 and 41-A Cr.P.C. Specific provisions under Sections 41 and 41-A Cr.P.C. have been provided giving protection to the accused persons from arrest in offences punishable up to seven years punishment.
Thus, prayer made in the present application is refused. 8. With the above observations, the present application stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Manish Kr Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad