URVASHI GUPTA D/O SHRI ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/341/2025 · 2025-09-11
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35615 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35615 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37819] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 204/2025
1. Ankit Sharma S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Vpo Manchal, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. 2. Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Vpo Bakhtawar Pura, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. 3. Nirmala Choudhary S/o Shri Babu Lal Choudhary, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 81, Green Park-B, Nangal Jaisa Bohra, Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Vitt Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Gokhale Lane, Opp. Collectorate Office Basant Vihar, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001
5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 341/2025
1. Urvashi Gupta D/o Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Baldevgarh, Tehsil Tehla (Rajgarh), District Alwar. 2. Rakesh Beniwal S/o Shri Radha Krishan, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Vpo Naurangdesar, District Hanumangarh. 3. Ritika Malav D/o Shri Harishankar Malav, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of 1415A, R.k. Puram, Kota. 4. Anita Jat D/o Shri Harmana Ram Jat, Aged About 23
[2025:RJ-JP:37819] (2 of 5) [CW-204/2025] Years, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Surwas, Post Gopalpura, Sujangarh, Churu. 5. Ritu D/o Shri Poonam Chand, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 42, Ganesh Mandir Ke Pass, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar. 6. Anoop Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Satyanarayan Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Hanumanpura, Tehsil Rajakheda, District Dholpur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Vitt Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur - Rajasthan. 4. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Gokhale Lane, Opp. Collectorate Office Basant Vihar, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001. 5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur - 302018. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1199/2025 Pravesh S/o Shri Radha Kishan, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Vpo Karanpura, Tehsil Bhadra, Hanumangarh-335501 (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Vitt Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur-Rajasthan. 4. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Gokhale Lane, Opp. Collectorate Office Basant Vihar, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001
[2025:RJ-JP:37819] (3 of 5) [CW-204/2025]
5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1558/2025 Narpat Choudhary S/o Shri Deepa Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/ o 42, Mahadev Nagar, Balsamand Mandore Road, Jodhpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur. 4. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer. 5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahmad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Prakhar Jain Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Aditya Godara Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari with Ms. Bhavana Ladha Mr. Umesh Choudhary for Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 11/09/2025
1. The issue involved in this batch of writ petitions is no more res integra and this Court in a batch of writ petitions led by Abhishek Shah Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board & Ors.
[2025:RJ-JP:37819] (4 of 5) [CW-204/2025] (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15294/2024) and other connected petitions decided on 03.09.2025 has held as under:
"1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above matters were heard finally and are being decided by this common order.
2. The issue involved in the present cases is whether holding the degree of B.Tech can be treated as sufficient qualification for holding the post of Junior Accountant and Tehsildar Revenue Accountant pursuant to advertisement dated 20.06.2023, whereas the aforesaid advertisement prescribes possession of RS- CIT Certificate as the necessary qualification in addition to the academic qualification mentioned in the advertisement.
3. Vide order dated 27.03.2025, this Court
directed the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, and Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, to provide a consolidated decision/opinion regarding whether the B.Tech degree can be considered equivalent to an RS-CIT Certificate or falls under the eligibility criteria vis-a-vis instant selection process.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, in compliance with the order dated 27.03.2025, a Committee was constituted, and meeting of the Committee was convened on 10.06.2025. After considering all the factors, it was decided in the meeting that degree of BE/B.Tech in any branch of Engineering is equivalent to RS-CIT, and the candidate’s eligibility should be determined accordingly. In the application filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and 3, it has been mentioned that the Committee had treated the computer subjects in all/some semesters of different streams at both Graduation and Post- Graduation levels as equivalent to RS-CIT, and recommending that candidate’s eligibility be determined accordingly.
5. In the said meeting dated 10.06.2025, Committee has also taken a conscious decision to hold that the candidates possessing computer concept certificate (CCC) issued by the NIELT are also equivalent certificates to that of RSCIT certificate. As such, persons holding the CCC are also eligible for the aforementioned recruitment examination.
6. In the light of above decision taken by the respondent-Government itself, it is declared that degree of BE/B.Tech and CCC shall be considered as sufficient qualification for determining the eligibility of the candidates wherever the requirement is to possess certificate of RS-CIT.
7. In light of above, the writ petitions are allowed with the direction to treat the petitioners as eligible for participating in the recruitment process for
[2025:RJ-JP:37819] (5 of 5) [CW-204/2025] the post of Junior Accountant and Tehsildar Revenue Accountant, pursuant to order dated 20.06.2023. The result of the petitioners is directed to be declared. In case, names of the petitioners are found at appropriate place in the merit list, appointment orders be issued in favour of the petitioners with all consequential benefits.
8. Hence, the writ petitions are allowed."
2. Instant writ petitions are also allowed in terms of directions given in the above case of Abhishek Shah (supra).
3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
4. Office is directed to place a copy of this order on record of each writ petition.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/304-306-310-315