Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35613 (AP)

J. CHENNAKESAVULU, GOLLAKANDRIGA [V], CHITTOOR DIST. v. J. VANAJA, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, & ANR.

CRLRC/446/2010 · 2025-08-06

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010569532010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 446/2010 Between: 1. J. CHENNAKESAVULU, GOLLAKANDRIGA [V], CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. J. SUBBARAYULU ELECTRICAL WORKER R/O. GOLLAKANDIRGA VILLAGE, D.M. PURAM POST, KARVETINAGAR MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1. J VANAJA TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANR, W/O. J. CHENNAKESAVULU RESIDING AT D.NO. 18-5-141, SAPTHAGIRI NAGAR, TIRUPATI, 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the order dt. 14-10- 2009 in M.C. No. 35 of 2006 on the file of the Judge, Family Court V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor, directing him to pay maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the 1st respondent from the date of filing of the M.C., the petitioner prefers this memorandum of Crl.Revision Case. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 665 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dt. 14-10-2009 in M.C. No. 35 of 2006 on the file of the Judge, Family Court V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati, pending disposal of the above Crl.Revision Case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.446 of 2010 ORDER: Sri P.V.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subsequent to the filing of this revision case, both parties have remarried and the cause does not survive. 2. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as cause does not survive. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 07.08.2025 M K K