VISHAL KISHAN JADHAV AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/173/2025 · 2025-04-24
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3561 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3561 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:2984 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.173 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Vishwa Prakash Bahuguna, learned counsel for petitioners.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 & 2.
3. None present for respondent No.3.
4. Learned State Counsel submits that after investigation, the final report has been submitted against all the petitioners, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it has become infructuous.
5. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners.
6. In view of the above, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
7. Pending application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
24.04.2025 PN
PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38 331bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FA E064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.04.24 15:26:28 +05'30'