APHC010570762011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24134/2011 Between: 1. SMT. C. LAXMI DEVI, W/O K. RAMAKRISHNA RAO, R/O.D.NO.19-240/19, UPSTAIRS, VIGNESWARA NAGAR, MITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. V.S. BALACHANDRAN, S/O V.D. SHANMUGAM, D.NO. 19-593, VIGNESWARA NAGAR, MITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. K. GOVINDA SWAMY, S/O K. CHINNAIAH D.NO. 24-344-1/2, BHARATNAGAR, CHITTOOR - 517002. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CHITTOOR. 2. A.REKHAVATHI, SCALE-I OFFICER, SAPTHAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK, MOGILI BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. K.RAGHUPATHI NAYUDU, SCALE-I OFFICER, SAPTHAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. C.MUNIRATNAM REDDY, SCALE-I OFFICER, PALAMANGALAM BRANCH, SAPTHAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. P.SADASIVA RAO, SCALE-I OFFICER, SAPTHAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, or Orders, Direction or Directions to declare the action of the 1st Respondent in promoting the Respondents 2 to 5 to the post of Officer (JMG) Scale-I by order dated 24.06.2011 in Circular No. 83/11 overlooking the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Rules, and to issue a consequential direction to the 1st Respondent to promote the petitioners to the post of Officer (JMG) Scale-I by reverting to the non-official Respondents. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. A BHASKARA CHARY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.24134 of 2011 ORDER: Ms.Priyanvitha Popuri, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners on record, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, it has become infructuous by afflux of time and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition. Learned counsel also endorsed the same on the bundle. In view of the said representation, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 27.06.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.24134 of 2011 Date : 27.06.2025 SPP