[2025:RJ-JP:36865] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 3/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5401/2014 Gulab Singh Son Of Shri Sau Prasad, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Daultabad, District Agra (Up) 283101 (At Present Working On The Post Of Chowkidar In Government Ambedkar Hostel, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Titpuri, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Addi. Chief Secretary To Government, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Shri Bachnesh Kumar Agarwal, Joint Secretary And Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Ambedkar Bhawan, G-3/1, Rajmahal Residency Area, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Shri Anil Machya, Assistant Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Room No. 243, 244, 245, Second Floor, Mini Secretariat, Bhawani Top, Alwar (Raj.) 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Addi. Chief Secretary To Government, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta Ms. Sampati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr. Ashutosh Udawat & Mr. Mahendra Pratap Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 11/09/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:36865] (2 of 2) [CCP-3/2025] 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 29.02.2024, whereby the writ petition was disposed of in the light of direction given in case of Mukesh Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.525/2007). 2. Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent contemnors submits that the petitioner has been regularized on the Post of Class-IV Employee and his due payment, including the arrears, has also been paid to him. 3. Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents contemnors has placed before this Court the letter dated 11.09.2025 issued by the Office of Deputy Director, Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Alwar, as regards the payment made to the petitioner. 4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the present contempt petition is disposed of as the respondents have already made specific compliance of the order of the Court. 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty for revival of the contempt petition if any fact as stated in the letter dated 11.09.2025 is found to be incorrect or if any amount is due. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /9