Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
129
SANGEETA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Nikita Gill, Advocate for
Mr
Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
MANISHA BATRA
1. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short appropriate directions to in the present case as the son of the petitioner has been murdered with further prayer to decide the representation dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prayer and has representation on Ferozepur (Annexure P petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to Superintendent by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M Date of decision:
SANGEETA AND ANOTHER
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Nikita Gill, Advocate for Mr. Karanjeet Brar, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
**** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short- appropriate directions to the official respondents in the present case as the son of the petitioner has been murdered with further e the representation dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner representation on 24.02.2025 before the Senior Annexure P-1) raising their grievances as petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to of Police, Ferozepur to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.15187 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025
…. Petitioners
…. Respondents MANISHA BATRA
, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under 528 of Bharatiya -‘BNSS’) seeking issuance of the official respondents to conduct fair investigation in the present case as the son of the petitioner has been murdered with further e the representation dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-1).
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners restricted his submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a Senior Superintendent of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior decide the aforesaid representation filed necessary action thereon. Bharatiya of conduct fair investigation in the present case as the son of the petitioner has been murdered with further s restricted his recently filed a of Police, in the present been taken be Senior decide the aforesaid representation filed Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.15187 of 2025
3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchika Sabh Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h
5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of one month
20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV
M No.15187 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P one month by passing a speaking order in
(MANISHA BATRA)
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No
M No.15187 of 2025 -2- erwal, Sr.
D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-1) of the petitioners within a by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without
disposed the aforesaid within a Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document