Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35602 (HP)

AMRA DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/16720/2025 · 2025-10-29

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16720 of 2025 Decided on: 29th October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amra Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:- “i. That the petitioner may be treated as a regular employee on completion of 10 years part time service, with all benefits incidental thereof. ” 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 4. Relief has been claimed on the strength of the decision rendered in Jaggo Versus Union of India & Ors.2. Admittedly, the petitioner, aged 61 years, has not preferred any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition. 5. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in Jaggo2 within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 29, 2025 Judge R.Atal 2 SLP(C) No.5580 of 2024, decided by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 20.12.2024