OMPRAKASH MEENA S/O MURARILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/678/2025 · 2025-03-12
Bhuwan Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3560 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3560 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11640] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 678/2025 Omprakash Meena S/o Murarilal, R/o 83/1 E-Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 12/03/2025
1. The present application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.309/2023 Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 379, 365, 504 & 506 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 28.02.2025, the petitioner has joined the investigation. He also submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. Similarly situated co-accused Prabhu has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 09.07.2024 and the case against the petitioner is on similar footing to that against the co-accused Prabhu. He has,
[2025:RJ-JP:11640] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-678/2025] therefore, prayed that the petitioner may also be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced at bar and have gone through material available on record.
7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; upon a consideration of the arguments advanced and stating the fact that the similarly situated co-accused Prabhu has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner - Omprakash Meena S/o Murarilal, in connection with F.I.R. No.309/2023 dated 26.06.2023 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, he shall be released on anticipatory bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
[2025:RJ-JP:11640] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-678/2025]
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J PAYAL DHAWAN /644