Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 356 (UTT)

NITIN ALIAS DHARMENDRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/281/2025 · 2026-01-10

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA2 No. 281 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Narendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General with Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Nitin @ Dharmendra’ S/o Shri Dayanand is praying for bail in reference to First Information Report dated 28.06.2024 bearing FIR No. 411 of 2024 P.S. Patel Nagar, District Dehradun, on the basis of which now Session Trial No. 124 of 2024 is going on, wherein, the applicant is facing trial for the offences under Sections 302, 201 r/w Section 34 of IPC. 4. The First bail application was rejected on 03.04.2025. Now, the instant second bail application has been moved. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.06.2024. Charge-sheet has already been filed and there is no any scope of tampering with the evidence and no further interrogation is required and as such be released on bail. He also submits that there are in total 13 prosecution witnesses but up till date not a single witness has been examined and as such there is no any possibility that within short span of period the trial would be expedited. 6. On the other side, learned State counsel submits that after collecting all credible evidences the charge- sheet has been filed. 7. Be that as it may, admittedly the charge-sheet has already been filed and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 28.06.2024 and not a single prosecution witness has been examined, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Nitin @ Dharmendra’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 10.01.2026 PR