- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 421 OF 2024 (SCST) BETWEEN: 1. GANGAMMA W/O. LATE THIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 2. SRINIVAS T., S/O. LATE THIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 3. NAGARAJU S/O. LATE THIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT BHOVI COLONY, NEAR GANGAMMANAHALLI, SIRA TOWN, TUMAKURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AMAR GOWDA K.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKURU, TUMKURU DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR SIRA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT. 5. BHEEMANA S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS. 6. ANKAMMA W/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS. 7. GEETHAMMA W/O. VIJAYANNA, AGED ABOUT YEARS. 8. RAGHAVENDRA S/O. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS. 9. SHIVAKUMAR. G S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS. 10. VIJAYANNA S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024 11. CHANDRIKA W/O. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS. 12. BHARATI W/O. SHIVAKUMAR. G AGED ABOUT YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT SOPINATTI NEAR, BANIMANTAPA SIRA TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO 4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DATED 20.07.2021 IN PTCL (REV) 05/2017-18, AND IN PTCL 05/2017-18 DATED 21.09.2020 AND ORDER PASSED BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DATED 19.04.2017 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, B AND C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5502 WP No. 421 of 2024 ORAL ORDER This Court on 15.11.2024 passed the following order: "One week time is granted to comply with the office objections, if the office objections are not complied with, the petition stands dismissed." 2. Neither the office objections have been complied nor the learned counsel for the petitioners is before this Court. 3. In light of the order dated 15.11.2024, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35 CT:SNN