HARMOHINDER SINGH @ LUCKY v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER
CRWP/3044/2024 · 2025-05-07
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35585 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35585 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-3044-2024 204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-3044-2024 Date of Decision: 07.05.2025 HARMOHINDER SINGH ALIAS LUCKY . . . . Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS . . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: - Mr. Karanbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh assisted by Mr. Ankur Bali, Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh with Sub Inspector-Didar Singh.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. The petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to provide adequate security cover to the petitioner, who is State President of a National Political Party, and has a threat to his life. Considering the submissions, this Court, vide interim
order dated 05.04.2024, directed the respondents to provide at least one armed PSO to him as an interim measure till the next date of hearing.
2. In compliance thereof, he was provided with an armed PSO.
Learned counsel for the U.T. submits that the allegation of threat to petitioner’s life has been enquired into from every angle. As of now, there is no specific threat to him by any means. The details of the enquiry carried out pertaining to the three Whatsapp numbers from which threatening calls were statedly received have been mentioned in the latest affidavit, dated 26.03.2025, filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Security Head Quarters, UT, Chandigarh. A meeting of a Protection Review Group (PRG) Poonam 2025.05.12 21:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-3044-2024 was also convened on 30.12.2024 to discuss the matter regarding security to the petitioner. The affidavit records: According to the report from Intelligence Agencies,
"There is no specific threat to Mr. Harmohinder Singh @ Lucky, Leader of the Congress Party, residing at H. No. 1146, Sector-8-C, Chandigarh, from anyone within the jurisdiction of UT Chandigarh. However, until the outcome of the High Court's directions in CRWP No. 3044/2024, the existing security of 1 PSO may continue. The next hearing for CRWP No. 3044/2024 is scheduled for 29.01.2025 in the Hon'ble High Court. Additionally, the local police and PCR vehicle officials are instructed to conduct regular patrols around his residence at H. No. 1146, Sector-8-C, Chandigarh, as well as around his office at the Territorial Congress Committee located in Sector-35, Chandigarh. Hence, it is prayed to look into the temporarily deployed security deployment matter of the petitioner on merit as "there is no specific threat to the petitioner at present from any means". Apart from the above explained position, other preventive measures have already been adopted by enhanced regular patrolling by PCR Vehicle/Cheeta Staff and Beat Staff officials and has been
directed to remain extra vigilant in anticipation for ensuring area security at and around the residence as well around the office premises of the petitioner to thwart any untoward incident therein.
3. There is no material before the Court to dispute the specific conclusion arrived at by the respondents. Since the petitioner is not facing any threat at present, the petition does not survive and is hereby disposed of, granting him liberty to represent to the concerned respondents in case of any Poonam 2025.05.12 21:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-3044-2024 threat to his life or liberty in future, which will be looked into and an appropriate action will be taken. 07.05.2025 poonam (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/no Whether reportable? Yes/no Poonam 2025.05.12 21:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document