Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35585 (AP)

GALLA DHAMODAR v. VINOD KUMAR

CC/104/2025 · 2025-03-07

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010569432024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 104/2025 Between: 1. GALLA DHAMODAR, S/O. G. NARAYANA, AGED 44YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.102,CBR RESIDENCY. MANIKONDA,HYDERABAD. 2. KANDIBEDALA ANIL KUMAR CHOWDARY, S/O. SANJEEVA RAIDU, AGED 50YEARS,OCC AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT1-713-5A, ADCC BANK COLONY, RUDRAMPETA, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. VINOD KUMAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SESHADRI GOALLA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. 2. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Smt. A. Jayanthi, learned Counsel for the Respondent, submits that the Orders of this Court have been complied with. He has also made a similar submission even on the last occasion. The matter could not be closed due to the absence of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners. Therefore, in view of the fact that the Orders of this Court have been complied with, no further consideration of this Court is required in this case. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.03.2025 DSV