Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3558 (CHH)

SECURED SECURITY SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED v. CHHATTISGARH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED

WPC/307/2025 · 2025-01-17

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2996-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 307 of 2025 1 - Secured Security Solution Private Limited, Through its Branch Manager, Jitendra Bahadur Singh S/o Shri Narendra Bahadur Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Old, R/o 3rd Floor, Ravi Bhavan, Jaistambh Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through its Managing Director, Block No. 7 A, 2nd Floor, Office Complex, Sector- 24, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Block No. 7 A, 2nd Floor, Office Complex, Sector- 24, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Amishan Hussain, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 17-01-2025 1. The present petition has been filed seeking following relief(s):- “1] That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, directing the Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 Respondent authorities to reevaluate the Petitioner’s technical evaluation result in accordance with the tender criteria and the documents submitted by the Petitioner 2] That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, directing the Respondent authorities to consider and decide the Petitioner’s representation dated 06.01.2025 (Annexure P/1) on merits before proceeding with the tender process. 3] That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw the present petition as the work order has been issued and agreement has been signed. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it afresh if he is so aggrieved by the action of the respondents. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil