APHC010569052024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3181/2024 Between: 1. M/S VEERABHADRA EXPORTS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI DWARAMPUDI VEERABHADRA REDDY, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, ITS HEAD OFFICE AT D.NO.13-5-1, RAMASOMAYAJULU STREET, KAKINADA, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI DWARAMPUDI VEERABHADRA REDDY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL LINES PTE LTD, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER LAWS OF SINGAPORE, A COMPANY REG.NO.196700080N, 140 CECIL STREET, PIL BUILDING, SINGAPORE-069640 and 4 OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAITRAIE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM NJS,J & GTK,J W.P No.3181 of 2024 2 The Court made the following Order: (per NJS,J) Heard Ms. R Soumya, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K Guna Sekhar, learned counsel on behalf of M/s. Indus Law Firm, present. Mr. Risabh Saxena, learned counsel, appeared through online. 2. Perused the docket proceedings. 3. On 08.05.2025, time was granted to the petitioner for taking steps to amend the cause-title and the matter was directed to be listed on 03.07.2025. 4. A request was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to grant time to comply with the orders dated 08.05.2025 and the Court by an order dated 03.07.2025 directed the matter to be listed on 14.08.2025. 5. At the request made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, further time was granted to take steps in terms of the order dated 08.05.2025 finally, vide order dated 14.08.2025 6. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms. R Soumya, learned counsel, states that despite the best efforts of the learned counsel on record, no instructions are forthcoming from the petitioner. Be that as it may. 7. Despite granting adequate time, the petitioner failed to comply with the orders dated 08.05.2025. In view of the same, for non-compliance of the said order, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. 8. Interim order granted on the earlier occasion stands dissolved. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA ____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date:17.09.2025 Ksj