[2025:RJ-JP:37867] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26257/2018 Babu Lal Verma S/o Suva Lal Verma, aged about 39 Years, R/o 79-A, Ambedkar Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 17/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking direction to the appropriate authority to appoint the petitioner to the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-I under SC Category. 2. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.2- The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. [2025:RJ-JP:37867] (2 of 2) [CW-26257/2018] 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2- The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-37