[2025:RJ-JP:7634] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19595/2024 Anchi Deegwal D/o Shri Chhitar Mal Deegwal W/o Shri Parmeshwar Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 35, Keshav Nagar-Ii, Charan Nadi, Benad Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Through Its Director, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. 4. Asha D/o Shri Jagmal Singh (Application Id No179728), Through The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 595/2025 Pramod Kumar Meena S/o Shri Soraj Meena, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Sehladanta, Post Borani, Tehsil Jahajpur, District Shahpura (Bhilwara) (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Through Its Director, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv. [2025:RJ-JP:7634] (2 of 3) [CW-19595/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/02/2025 1. The present matter pertains to recruitment on the post of Nursing Officer in pursuance to the vacancies issued vide advertisement dated 05.05.2023. 2. Considering the identical factual narrative, legal issues, and with consent of the various counsel representing the matters, the present bunch of petitions are adjudicated vide this judgment wherein, Anchi Deegwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19595/2024 is taken as the lead petition. It is made clear that the present judgment shall be made applicable on mutatis mutandis basis on the petitions connected herein. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petitions are filed seeking directions for consideration of the experience certificate of the petitioners which as per the respondents, is not in the prescribed format. It is further submitted that due to the said non-consideration of experience certificate, the bonus marks which are to be granted to the petitioners, considering the service rendered by them during the period of pandemic of COVID-19 are not awarded. 4. Further, learned counsel while placing reliance upon the ratio encapsulated in Suhana Bano Vs. the State of Rajasthan and Ors.: SBCWP No. 10518/2024, has contended that merely under the garb of technicalities, the dedicated efforts of a meritorious candidate should not be prejudiced. [2025:RJ-JP:7634] (3 of 3) [CW-19595/2024] 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has fairly conceded the fact that the lis/controversy in hand is squarely covered by the dictum enunciated in Suhana Bano (supra), and the present petitions can be decided in light of the same. 6. Heard and considered. 7. In light of the foregoing facts and circumstances, the present petitions are allowed in terms of the ratio encapsulated in Suhana Bano (Supra). Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-214,299