SHRILAL LODHA S/O GHASEE LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/437/2024 · 2025-01-13
Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35561 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35561 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1763-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 437/2024 Shrilal Lodha S/o Ghasee Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Purane Mandir Ke Pass Chandipur Tehsil Manohar Thana Police Station Jawar Dist Jhalawar ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director General Of Police, Jaipur
2. Addl. Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Jhalawar.
4. Sho, Police Station, Jawar, District Jhalawar.
5. Sho. Police Station, Dangipura, District Jhalawar.
6. Shri Satya Narayan S/o Shri Ram Prasad, R/o Kherkheda, Police Station Jawar, District Jhalawar.
7. Shiva Gurjar S/o Ram Charan, R/o Nesh Gujran, Police Station Dangipura, District Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Y.K. Sharma Mr. Arvind Kumar Arora For State : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Lakshman Singh (I.O.), SHO alongwith Ms. Mamta MFC No. 1332 Police Station Jawar, District Jhalawar, Present in Person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 13/01/2025
1. Petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking production of the corpus who happens to be wife of the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:1763-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-437/2024]
2. Corpus has been produced before the Court. We appreciate the efforts put in by the Police in tracing and producing the corpus.
3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has clearly stated that she is not in any illegal detention and does not want to go with the petitioner.
4. Since corpus is a major and has stated before the Court that she is not in any illegal detention and does not want to go with the petitioner, we are not inclined to entertain this present habeas corpus petition.
5. Accordingly, the present habeas corpus petition is dismissed.
6. Corpus is free to go to the place of her choice.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J MAHIMA/28