Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3556 (UTT)

FIROZ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/408/2025 · 2025-03-18

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 408 of 2025 Firoz ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Ms. Ruhani Sahani, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 0822 of 2022, under Section 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Manglore, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. According to the FIR, on 03.08.2022, 14.10 grams smack was allegedly recovered from the possession of co-accused Harun. It is he, who revealed that he had brought smack from the applicant. 4. It is the case of the applicant that he has no role; he has been falsely implicated; nothing was recovered from him; he was implicated merely based on the statement of co- accused; co-accused has already been granted bail. 2 5. Learned State Counsel would submit that based on the statement of co-accused, the applicant has been implicated in the case, but she admits that co-accused, has already been granted bail. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 18.03.2025 Ravi Bisht